When monitoring network traffic, which aspect is fully visible from a ProxySG packet capture?

When conducting a packet capture using a ProxySG, the primary aspect that is fully visible is the requests from the client and the responses from the server. This is because the ProxySG acts as an intermediary between the client and the server, and during packet capture, it logs all the interactions that occur across this communication channel.

In the context of network monitoring, a packet capture will provide insight into the HTTP request headers sent by the client, which contain details such as the requested resources, HTTP methods, and any relevant session information. Additionally, the responses from the server, which include the status codes, headers, and the content returned to the client, are also fully visible. This level of visibility allows for comprehensive analysis of network transactions and the effectiveness of communications.

Other options do not represent the complete view provided by a ProxySG packet capture. For example, non-encrypted messages may indeed be visible, but encrypted traffic, such as HTTPS, would not be fully observable. System errors are typically not captured within the traffic logs themselves; they would need to be drawn from logs specific to system operations. Network configurations, while important for understanding how the ProxySG operates within the network, are not details that can be seen in a packet capture focused on traffic flow.